Perez Hilton is to journalism what BP is to environmentalism: A disgrace, to say the very least. I'm no Hilton supporter, and I've made no secret of that. In fact, of all the sentences I've written in my career, there are three that are quoted more often than any others, and they are about him.
Here's just one example taken from a 2006 essay that was published on AfterEllen.com, as quoted in the Perez Hilton Wikipedia entry:
I have to question the character of a man who attacks others on such deeply personal levels, without provocation and for self-benefit, monetary or otherwise....If he's emotionally incapable of exhibiting even the tiniest bit of compassion for closeted people, if he can't be sensitive to the fact that coming out is a very personal decision and that the process can be difficult for some — especially celebrities — I feel sorry for him. If his juvenile behavior is his shtick, I think it makes him a much more pathetic figure, and one the gay and lesbian community should not support...If we support behavior like Hilton's, we applaud shallowness, arrogance, rage and invasion of privacy, and risk becoming what we despise.
I mention this because two of those sentences were quoted in this Huffington Post story published yesterday regarding Hilton's lack of character pertaining to his decision to Tweet allegedly fake pictures of 17-year-old Miley Cyrus' private parts. He's taken the photos down because he doesn't "want to go to jail." But what's done is done. There's no unringing that slimy bell.
There's also no need for me to go in to detail how I feel about his attack on Miley and celebrities in general. The man is scum and my feelings about him will survive us both, no doubt. And that's perfectly fine with me.